The talent pool may not match the function
Professional, management, finance, analytics, technology, legal, and administrative labor depth can vary widely by market.
A headquarters location is more than an office address. It affects leadership access, professional recruiting, retention, travel, company image, cost, and the ability to support future growth.

Professional and leadership labor.
Airport, commute, and client reach.
Real estate, tax, and operating exposure.
Leadership teams often focus on image, real estate, or tax differences. Those matter, but the location also has to work for the people who will run, support, and grow the business.
Professional, management, finance, analytics, technology, legal, and administrative labor depth can vary widely by market.
Airport connectivity, commute patterns, client access, and regional coverage affect productivity and leadership availability.
Cheaper real estate or taxes can be offset by limited senior talent, relocation resistance, or weak workforce depth.
The market must support brand presence, client confidence, employee attraction, and practical operating requirements.
SITE looks at the headquarters decision through a business operating lens: can the location attract the right people, support leadership access, control cost, and sustain the company over time?
Clarify functions, leadership needs, employee profile, growth expectations, travel needs, hybrid work assumptions, and decision priorities.
Evaluate management, business, finance, analytics, technology, administrative, and specialized talent pools.
Use GIS to assess commute sheds, airport access, client proximity, executive travel, regional coverage, and competitive employer context.
Confirm wage expectations, recruiting difficulty, relocation concerns, employer competition, and local market reputation through practical research.
The exact model changes by project, but the analysis should connect the operating requirement to labor, cost, geography, infrastructure, competition, and validation evidence.
Measures depth, wages, education levels, skill mix, and employer competition for target functions.
Reviews airport connectivity, commute patterns, housing access, and practical travel considerations.
Compares real estate, wages, taxes, incentives, relocation cost, and ongoing overhead.
Considers regulatory environment, tax exposure, economic stability, and market perception.
Maps labor, housing, commute access, competitors, transportation, and client or regional relationships.
Tests whether the market can actually recruit and retain the functions the headquarters requires.
A headquarters market may look strong in rankings, but SITE looks for evidence behind the decision: employer movement, recruiting feedback, wage reality, talent availability, relocation concerns, and whether comparable organizations can hire and retain the same type of workforce.